Jump to content
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

Recommended Posts

Posted

I noticed the sun behind a leaf on my Latania loddigesii this morning and took this photo. It is quite slow growing - can someone explain to me why it is called "Blue Latan Palm" when in fact the petioles are Red !? Both photos were taken this morning, the planting and sowing dates are on the label:

c1a36881.jpg

78d9833f.jpg

Posted

I've just found a photo of this taken in October 2007 - so you can see that this specimen has not really got much bigger in the last five years

ed517626.jpg

The petioles seem to be even redder then

Posted

Wow, that first photo is a real eye-popper! I am certainly no expert, but it would seem your palm was mislabeled and is really Latania lontaroides.

Kim Cyr

Between the beach and the bays, Point Loma, San Diego, California USA
and on a 300 year-old lava flow, Pahoa, Hawaii, 1/4 mile from the 2018 flow
All characters  in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

Posted

Very nice but it looks like my red latan, so I wonder too. If it is the red it's stil a very good thing. I believe the red latan is the rarest of the 3 species and, supposedly, the most difficult to grow. But mine is doing very well here and is a bit larger than yours. I got it in March 2010 after our record cold winter. It has at least doubled in size.

Meg

Palms of Victory I shall wear

Cape Coral (It's Just Paradise)
Florida
Zone 10A on the Isabelle Canal
Elevation: 15 feet

I'd like to be under the sea in an octopus' garden in the shade.

Posted (edited)

Hi Kim

Many thanks for your encouraging comments. I don't think this is L. lontaroides as I have five nice specimens in the garden - they are much faster growing and the petiole is totally different, covered in a lovely indumentum. If my palms with the red petioles are really this then all my L. lontaroides will need identifying and new labels! Dr. Mike Ferrari the Australian palm botanist did confirm my lontaroides but not the loddigesii.

Also I don't think it is L. verschaffeltii as for me this is as slow growing of what I have labelled as the L. loddigessii as for me, as what I have labelled as L. verschaffeltii has stunning yellow petioles:

8d3cef57.jpg

25f8690c.jpg

432f867c.jpg

Edited by David Clulow
Posted

They are all sensational. I think the 'blueness' comes out when they get to the trunking stage

Palms are the king of trees

Brod

Brisbane, Australia

28 latitude, sub tropical

summer average 21c min - 29c max

winter average 10c min - 21c max

extremes at my place 5c - 42c

1100 average rainfall

Posted

The blueness will come in time. I had a L. loddigesii that had all the red when young, had started to blue up and then 2010 came. RIP

Posted

The labels on loddigesii and lontaroides need to be swapped with each other. Beautiful palms.

Posted

David,

Your labels are correct. My two blue latans are green and red, just like yours. This is a characteristic of the seedling/juvenile stage.

Frank

 

Zone 9b pine flatlands

humid/hot summers; dry/cool winters

with yearly freezes

Posted

Hmmm.... love Latanias, I heard there's hybridising happening with these guys

Happy Gardening

Cheers,

Wal

Queensland, Australia.

Posted

I have checked quite carefully on the internet and now think that Kim was originally correct and Pez hit the nail on the head and is correct. The error occurred in two distinct ways. First, in the Botanic Garden in Caracas, there is at least one large fruiting L. loddigesii which is labelled L. lontaroides and I suspect that the nursery from which I purchased my seedlings obtained its seeds from there and just copied the incorrect label. A few years later I also collected some seeds off this specimen and used the name on the BG label. And secondly, quite a coincidence, the seeds I received from RPS as L.loddigesii turned out to be in fact L. lontaroides. Here is the PACSOA photo from the internet of L. lontaroides:

f9fe6705.jpg

Compare it to this photo taken this morning:

99958419.jpg

I think you will have to agree that they are the same

So I have changed the label. The system I use is very simple, very inexpensive and fast, it takes only seconds to prepare a new label and cost pennies

0af97d45.jpg

Here is a photo of Latania loddigesii off the internet and I'm sure you will agree that it closely matched the specimen I posted yesterday:

f468063f.jpg

Posted

I am happy to see that the L. Loddigesii can be this colour at it early stage. I have two small seedlings, about 20 cm, that have this nice red petiole and yellow leafs. I have had some problems with the id of many of my seedlings since my two small dogs messed up all the seeds one night.

I will post som pictures next week..

Thanks for nice photos and important info..

saludos...

Jonas

Rurrenabaque - Bolivia

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...