Jump to content
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just ran across this relatively large plant at the Huntington that is labeled as Livistona rotundifolia… hard for me to believe, but it does have huge, round leaves… could it be? Even Livistona carinensis is nearly impossible to grow at the Huntington… is this one easier?? Not sure how I have missed this plant… been to this part of the garden over 100 times so far…. just not that observant I guess.

post-426-0-64225600-1412483701_thumb.jpgpost-426-0-14168200-1412483744_thumb.jpgpost-426-0-52643000-1412483779_thumb.jpgpost-426-0-66457700-1412483807_thumb.jpg

Posted

Could it be a mislabeled L. saribus?

Jim in Los Altos, CA  SF Bay Area 37.34N- 122.13W- 190' above sea level

zone 10a/9b

sunset zone 16

300+ palms, 90+ species in the ground

Las Palmas Design

Facebook Page

Las Palmas Design & Associates

Elegant Homes and Gardens

Posted

It is among the group of 'Livistona' saribus and for years I guess I assumed it was the same… but it looks very different from the L saribus they have there, and it is indeed labeled quite clearly Livistona rotundifolia, even with comments on origin etc. So what it actually is I don't know, but seems a bit too happy to be rotunidifolia. But this individual is clearly very different from the saribus around it, in terms of leaf shape, thickness, color and peitolar spines.

Posted (edited)

I used to think that the two were synonymous as well, but from many of the pictures that I've seen, L. saribus has very deep leaf divisions, similar to S. mauritiformis. Of course, there are many distinctitions between L. saribus and S. mauritiformis, perhaps most notably the thorns on the petioles and the silver cast to the undersides of the leaves. In addition, there are at least 2 forms of L. saribus that I know of - a black petiole and a green petiole form. These 2 forms are said to display different cold hardiness.

L. saribus

post-7959-0-39062600-1412527776_thumb.jp

post-7959-0-81694800-1412528097_thumb.jp

S. mauritiformis

post-7959-0-66959200-1412527928_thumb.jp

Edited by Sabal Steve
Posted

I remember seeing some potted ones at one of Gary Woods sales. I figured he could grow it if anyone could, but he told me that they would only grow in his greenhouse. Having said that, the one pictured does have the look of a marginal palm in Southern California. Never tried one myself.

Bret

 

Coastal canyon area of San Diego

 

"In the shadow of the Cross"

Posted

Saribus rotundifolius has black spines. The yellow/orange spines on yours would indicate it is something else. Livistona saribus also has dark thorns for the most part and as others have pointed out, the leaves are quite different. I have a hunch you are looking at something in the Livistona speciosa/jenkinsiana complex with that big uninterrupted expanse of leaf. L. speciosa is listed as having orange-to-brown spines. Whatever it is, it sure has beautiful foliage! S. rotundifolius is indeed long established, through hard-won testing, as unable to cut it in SoCal.

Michael Norell

Rancho Mirage, California | 33°44' N 116°25' W | 287 ft | z10a | avg Jan 43/70F | Jul 78/108F avg | Weather Station KCARANCH310

previously Big Pine Key, Florida | 24°40' N 81°21' W | 4.5 ft. | z12a | Calcareous substrate | avg annual min. approx 52F | avg Jan 65/75F | Jul 83/90 | extreme min approx 41F

previously Natchez, Mississippi | 31°33' N 91°24' W | 220 ft.| z9a | Downtown/river-adjacent | Loess substrate | avg annual min. 23F | Jan 43/61F | Jul 73/93F | extreme min 2.5F (1899); previously Los Angeles, California (multiple locations)

Posted

totally agree with michael. the palm in this thread looks like jenkinsiana, to me. S.rotundifolia is not supposed to grow here in socal by CW & i have certainly never seen a substantiated individual growing outdoors. i have a small one that i grew from seed collected near bogor botanical garden which i will try to grow in the garden when it gets bigger, but i am not sure it will survive long-term.

  • Upvote 1

the "prince of snarkness."

 

still "warning-free."

 

san diego,california,left coast.

Posted

Sounds good to me… L jenkinsiana is also pretty marginal here, but some manage to grow it… this plant is growing under a dense canopy of Livistona saribus so it perhaps just happened to planted in a great microclimate there.

Posted

i am growing an L.jenkinsiana, Geoff. its slow but looks great :)

the "prince of snarkness."

 

still "warning-free."

 

san diego,california,left coast.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...