Jump to content
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

Third weekend in the wet tropics of Australia


Yunder Wækraus

Recommended Posts

Been loving the past two weeks. My campus abuts rainforest, and there are all sorts of crazy critters here: cockatoos, lorikeets, megapodes, geckos, etc. Here are a few pix: a lipstick palm outside a friend's house, a tropical tree frog, a walking stick insect, and a large goanna at the beach. I'll post pix of campus palms once I get a chance to use my camera instead of my phone.

IMG_5931.JPG

IMG_5949.JPG

IMG_5951.JPG

IMG_5965.JPG

IMG_5966.JPG

IMG_5967.JPG

  • Upvote 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yunder,

Great to see you posting from the real tropics. How does the region compare to the Glades? Look forward to more. Thank you 

  • Upvote 1

What you look for is what is looking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bubba said:

Yunder,

Great to see you posting from the real tropics. How does the region compare to the Glades? Look forward to more. Thank you 

Two things: (1) lusher (somehow!), and (2) just a bit less hot

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those Cyrtostachys are fabulous! Enjoy your stay and all the great palm habitats.

  • Upvote 1

Meg

Palms of Victory I shall wear

Cape Coral (It's Just Paradise)
Florida
Zone 10A on the Isabelle Canal
Elevation: 15 feet

I'd like to be under the sea in an octopus' garden in the shade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Goanna looks like a Lace Monitor.    Enjoy your time  (and the rain) in FNQ, there is plenty of interesting places to visit in that part of the world.

 

   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I second the comment that those Cyrtostachys are fabulous! Enjoy the tropics!

  • Upvote 1

Lived in Cape Coral, Miami, Orlando and St. Petersburg Florida.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lace Monitors, Varanus varius, are very common on the east coast. They're the only one of the larger Goannas that haven't been impacted significantly by Cane Toads.

The Stick Insect looks like a juvenile Darwin Stick Insect, Eurycnema osiris. Adults are larger with a thicker body, mainly green all over with some coloured markings.

Bit hard to tell with the frog but most likely Litoria gracilenta. They have a creamier colour underneath but exposed like that they hold their legs in tight and you only see the green surface.

If you like bushwalking/hiking there's a lot of great walks in that area.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, tropicbreeze said:

The Lace Monitors, Varanus varius, are very common on the east coast. They're the only one of the larger Goannas that haven't been impacted significantly by Cane Toads.

The Stick Insect looks like a juvenile Darwin Stick Insect, Eurycnema osiris. Adults are larger with a thicker body, mainly green all over with some coloured markings.

Bit hard to tell with the frog but most likely Litoria gracilenta. They have a creamier colour underneath but exposed like that they hold their legs in tight and you only see the green surface.

If you like bushwalking/hiking there's a lot of great walks in that area.

 

Are you seriously telling me that those are BABY stick insects?!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Yunder Wækraus Looks like you are enjoying yourself down there!  We miss you here in the Sunshine State, but it's good to see all the neat sights!

  • Upvote 1

Lakeland, FL

USDA Zone 1990: 9a  2012: 9b  2023: 10a | Sunset Zone: 26 | Record Low: 20F/-6.67C (Jan. 1985, Dec.1962) | Record Low USDA Zone: 9a

30-Year Avg. Low: 30F | 30-year Min: 24F

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Yunder Wækraus said:

Are you seriously telling me that those are BABY stick insects?!?!

Can't tell size from your photo but it doesn't have the adult colours. Maybe next moult, don't know. One of the juveniles I found at my place.

ai-n-141109-09.jpg.f2f2e3ea47f39de2f103a


This is a female I found at home, from head to tip of tail she was 230 mm, but with her front legs extended out front in camouflage mode she was 305 mm long. You can see the difference in body mass and colour compared to a juvenile. She also has a broad lilac streak along the full length of the back of the thorax.

ai-n-150510-14.jpg.ade099413d5863172ee44

ai-n-150510-07.jpg.a806fef89cdbe5247c2d0

That's a great photo of the Spectacled Flying-fox, Pteropus conspicillatus. They're considered pests by a lot of fruit growers, although they are a protected species.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, tropicbreeze said:

Can't tell size from your photo but it doesn't have the adult colours. Maybe next moult, don't know. One of the juveniles I found at my place.

ai-n-141109-09.jpg.f2f2e3ea47f39de2f103a


This is a female I found at home, from head to tip of tail she was 230 mm, but with her front legs extended out front in camouflage mode she was 305 mm long. You can see the difference in body mass and colour compared to a juvenile. She also has a broad lilac streak along the full length of the back of the thorax.

ai-n-150510-14.jpg.ade099413d5863172ee44

ai-n-150510-07.jpg.a806fef89cdbe5247c2d0

That's a great photo of the Spectacled Flying-fox, Pteropus conspicillatus. They're considered pests by a lot of fruit growers, although they are a protected species.

I think mine is a different species. The one in my photo has a head-to-abdomen length of at least 4-6", and if the outstretched front legs are added, the total length might be 7-9". Not sure what that is in metric, but it's definitely larger than 3cm! If a 6" bug is just a baby, I can't imagine the size of the adult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just realized I got the centimeters wrong. Sounds like your size ranges are in line with mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just googled:

4 - 6 inches = 101.6mm - 152.4mm

7 - 9 inches = 177.8mm - 228.6mm

230mm = 9.06 inches

305mm = 12.01 inches

A slightly larger species is the related Eurycnema goliath. But if you like getting right up into the canopy of rainforest you might be lucky enough to find the largest one, Ctenomorpha gargantua, which can get over 600mm (= 23.6 inches) in camouflage mode (front legs outstretched). That's one I'd love to find.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tropicbreeze said:

Just googled:

4 - 6 inches = 101.6mm - 152.4mm

7 - 9 inches = 177.8mm - 228.6mm

230mm = 9.06 inches

305mm = 12.01 inches

A slightly larger species is the related Eurycnema goliath. But if you like getting right up into the canopy of rainforest you might be lucky enough to find the largest one, Ctenomorpha gargantua, which can get over 600mm (= 23.6 inches) in camouflage mode (front legs outstretched). That's one I'd love to find.

 

Whoa!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dug up a photo on the internet of Ctenomorpha gargantua taken by researchers from Museum of Victoria in the wet tropics a few years ago.

gargantuan-insect-3.jpg.2cf03fc7784c0d5f

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mate, those Lipsticks look better natural, like the first shot, not fake, that 'enhance' button is best left alone.

You really don't need to photoshop a Lipstick. Just my opinion, great shots anyway. 

 

  • Upvote 1

Cheers Steve

It is not dead, it is just senescence.

   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, gtsteve said:

Mate, those Lipsticks look better natural, like the first shot, not fake, that 'enhance' button is best left alone.

You really don't need to photoshop a Lipstick. Just my opinion, great shots anyway. 

 

Lol--it's the same shot from my old iPhone, but one is cropped. If I had been there with my proper camera, the shot would not have lost so much resolution after such a minimal close up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...