Jump to content
SCAMMER ALERT - IMPORTANT - PLEASE READ - CLICK HERE ×
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

Recommended Posts

Posted

In this satellite image of Cape Sable, you can see several small groves of palms a few hundred feet inland. There is one individual right on the beach that looks like cocos almost certainly, but the groupings a bit further away look more like roystonea. However I can't find any documentation on this population, and I'm not even sure royals can survive coastal conditions in this location. Does anybody have some documentation or information about this population? Or at least some input as to whether these are royals or something else

 

https://www.google.com/maps/@25.1543549,-81.1231136,153m/data=!3m1!1e3

Posted

I have heard that there is a population of thrinax radiata on Cape Sable. I have no idea as to the validity of that. But I have never heard of roystonea in that area.

Posted (edited)
On ‎3‎/‎9‎/‎2018‎ ‎3‎:‎28‎:‎18‎, Ubuntwo said:

In this satellite image of Cape Sable, you can see several small groves of palms a few hundred feet inland. There is one individual right on the beach that looks like cocos almost certainly, but the groupings a bit further away look more like roystonea. However I can't find any documentation on this population, and I'm not even sure royals can survive coastal conditions in this location. Does anybody have some documentation or information about this population? Or at least some input as to whether these are royals or something else

 

https://www.google.com/maps/@25.1543549,-81.1231136,153m/data=!3m1!1e3

Ian,

Welcome to the forum.  I am certain that the palm on the beach is a Jamaican Tall Coconut Palm, as that is the original Coconut Palm growing along the coast of South Florida.  I am honestly surprised that there are not at least a few more Jamaican Tall scattered up and down the beach there.  And it looks like there are indeed about 3 mature Royal Palms just inland of the beach to the right of the Coconut Palm in the jungle canopy there!  I think that because that is the Gulf Coast/Florida Bay area of the Peninsula where the sea water is VERY SHALLOW and NOT much tidal difference there, so unless there is a hurricane coming into the area, it would never see any sea water inundation, and the high rainfall there and because of the lighter sea breeze than the Atlantic Coast of South Florida, would probably be enough rain to alleviate the salty air conditions enough for Royal Palms to grow there in the jungle.

John

Edited by Mr. Coconut Palm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...