Jump to content
NEW PALMTALK FEATURE - CHECK IT OUT ×
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

Cat palm variation


Recommended Posts

Posted

I made an interesting observation this morning at my local Home Depot. They had just received some new pallets of Majesty and Cat which were still partially wrapped and all looked perfectly normal. These were to replace their current stock which had clearly been left outside during our recent two-night freeze in Houston and looked pretty rough - except for two Cat palms. These two had no apparent cold damage and also looked quite different, being noticeably shorter and had fatter stems. They certainly weren't new as the soil in the pots looked old and they were mixed amongst the other old stock.  I figured I'd roll the dice on these two.  Out of curiosity I stopped by another nearby HD but they only had the taller, thinner Cat palms and had protected them from the freeze.

I assume the variation is just due to different suppliers with different growing conditions? Or are there random hybrids and other things all sold together as 'Cat Palms'?

The first two images are one of the short/fat ones, the 3rd shows the taller ones. 

Whole plant.jpg

Cat palm base.jpg

Thin cat palms.jpg

Posted

'Tall' variation looks like Dypsis lutescens. Note that there are a dozen or so separate plants crammed into those pots.  Dypsis lutescens is a clustering species, but it won't offset when it's that small - those are only seedlings. The true Chamadedorea in the first photos appears to be an actual single clustering specimen, mature enough to be producing inflorescences. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

I don't think the 'Tall' variant is a Dypsis - I think it is a Chamaedorea of some kind.  I agree that it could be a pot of multiple younger plants.

I was able to answer one questions though. The label from the shorter/fatter plants I bought names a different supplier (Nature Creations) than the 'Tall' version (Costa Desire) - see pics. Both versions are labelled as Cat palms for what thats worth. I'm still inclined to write this off as just variation in growing conditions, but given I rarely see Cat palms planted in Houston, I don't know how much they vary. 

label 1.jpg

label.jpg

Posted

The taller ones really do look like D. Lutescens. I'm growing both on my patio. 

 

I've got 3 cat palms - my biggest lives under a grow light in a corner of my apartment. It started out as a $20 HD like yours. Everything was kinda huddled in this picture when we had that last freeze, but it's the tall one.  Message_1642649168600.thumb.jpg.9a4e0f86bba984811eef8a3b30a2f0be.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Now that i think about it, they might be c. Elegans. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...