Jump to content
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

Recommended Posts

Posted

Definitely recommend Chamaedoreas. Skinniest trunk I can think of is C. microspadix, but that is a clumping variety, not a solitary. C. oreophilia is a really petite single trunking variety that I don't see grown much, but is definitely eye-catching. In my experience (outdoor Souther California), it is very slow-growing compared to other Chamaedoreas. Not sure if that is a positive or negative for your purposes. I second the above sentiments about C. Plumosa, I love them and plant them in gardens any chance I get.

Attached pictures are some C. microspadix we have, with an average-sized finger for scale.

2145801421_image5(1).jpeg.ec34d672b3dadb157aa97d556dfa879f.jpeg2063324394_image4(1).jpeg.dd805f02eb97a80b2369cd8b86a452a4.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, William Ryan said:

Definitely recommend Chamaedoreas. Skinniest trunk I can think of is C. microspadix, but that is a clumping variety, not a solitary. C. oreophilia is a really petite single trunking variety that I don't see grown much, but is definitely eye-catching. In my experience (outdoor Souther California), it is very slow-growing compared to other Chamaedoreas. Not sure if that is a positive or negative for your purposes. I second the above sentiments about C. Plumosa, I love them and plant them in gardens any chance I get.

Attached pictures are some C. microspadix we have, with an average-sized finger for scale.

2145801421_image5(1).jpeg.ec34d672b3dadb157aa97d556dfa879f.jpeg2063324394_image4(1).jpeg.dd805f02eb97a80b2369cd8b86a452a4.jpeg

I don't mind if it's slow growing or fast, I really do want Plumosa but it seems very difficult to find anyone who has seeds and I wouldn't mind oreophilia either if I had access to anyone selling seeds affordably haha, I don't mind getting a clumping Chamaedorea, but they remind me so much of box store generic "cat palms", which aren't bad but doesn't really interest my eyes and too many palms in the pot stunting growth and I'd much rather prefer Chamaedorea elegans to not be thrown together into one pot to make it look more appealing and fuller. :blush2:

Edited by ZPalms
  • Like 1
Posted

I walked into lowes for 2 things that wasn't a plant but walked out with Chamaedorea elegans, I intend to seperate them so I can enjoy the palm in it's natural state :blush2:

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted

It's a clumper, but Rhapis multifida is an excellent palm with skinny trunks. You could thin them out so there are fewer of them, but it's hard to beat this palm for indoors and protected outdoors in warmer weather.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Pal Meir said:

If the two male Ch. elegans are still alive (?) they ought to be 50 yr old now:

281545598_Chamaedoreaelegans2017-07-20P1030864.thumb.jpg.b0768ece6d25851203986e3cb945f996.jpg

282603666_Chamaedoreaelegans2017-07-20P1030853.thumb.jpg.eb12845a662100b0753fb43fb9fe78e3.jpg

Oh wow that's amazing! In the wild does it start to fall over or is the trunk stronger to hold the weight of it's crown?

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/2/2022 at 11:37 PM, NorCalWill said:

It's a clumper, but Rhapis multifida is an excellent palm with skinny trunks. You could thin them out so there are fewer of them, but it's hard to beat this palm for indoors and protected outdoors in warmer weather.

I think this palm looks nice, I'd probably get it once my greenhouse is finally up and running because I think these would look very nice in big outdoor pots 😍

 

On 9/3/2022 at 7:43 AM, Pal Meir said:

Another candidate: Ch. metallica

153491097_Chamaedoreametallica2002-12-01DSC00137.thumb.jpg.84eb573fc63097f57ecdcd135ca15493.jpg

I do like the way these look but they kind of remind me of just regular plants when I see them in pots but as a outdoor complimentary palm it would be pretty nice 😍

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...